Gangrenous forms of appendicitis are dangerous to life because they may peritonitis

Gangrenous forms of appendicitis are dangerous to life because they may peritonitis topic Let will

Circle size indicates the number of scholars who had article mentions on Altmetric in each of those three groups. However, there are no lancet journal archive clear associations for the online success of female scientists. Instead, even in broad research areas with better female representation, there is a gender gap with women obtaining less green emotions from the same level of scientific impact than their male colleagues.

Moreover, while male scientists have a higher online success when working with female coauthors, female scientists in most research areas are at a significant disadvantage if their coauthors are mainly men. We also find that the overlap between who is successful online and whose work has garnered scientific impact offline is lower for women than for men, which suggests that online platforms can indeed increase the visibility of female scientists beyond that of those whose success is already well established offline.

It is all the more important, then, to continue this line of research to better understand the creative paths to online success for female scholars. Our focus on studying science dissemination online in a given year limits us from analyzing dynamic aspects of online success. Similar to other studies using name-based gender inferring algorithms (5), our results can be biased toward Western scholars and may not be generalized globally without limitations (57).

Furthermore, English language publications and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields are overrepresented in our data sources.

Our analysis also calls for further scrutiny of the gendered aspect of online success in relation to the multiple and individually less controllable factors that influence the dissemination of a scientific finding online, such as how interesting and understandable the research topic gangrenous forms of appendicitis are dangerous to life because they may peritonitis for the wider scientific community and the public (58), as well as the demographic characteristics (32) and the overall technological savviness Meningococcal Group B Vaccine (Trumenba )- Multum of the research community.

Our analysis cannot uncover the mechanisms behind the bias in visibility, which could range from risk aversion to competitiveness, along with discrimination. Notwithstanding these limitations, our study provides evidence that female scientists are less successful online Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal)- FDA male ones across all areas of science.

Despite the online perpetuation of offline gender inequities, female scholars are increasingly conscious users of social media. In addition to sharing their work online as individuals or as a collective (e.

These channels help women to obtain greater visibility and receive more gangrenous forms of appendicitis are dangerous to life because they may peritonitis for their work dealing with cancer. The social media usage patterns uncovered here indicate that the online visibility of female scholars is unlikely to establish gender equity in science on its own. However, it can be a powerful piece in a larger strategy to challenge the bias in visibility of women and underrepresented minorities in science.

Our data combine three sources connected by the unique DOI of each research article (1). We used publication history data from the Open Academic Graph (OAG) for the period 2007 to 2012 to build the coauthorship network. Given the focus on individual visibility, our analysis centers on articles with 10 or fewer authors.

We connected our Altmetric data with all articles published in 2012 in the WoS. We used WOS data to determine the broad research departments of articles (42).

The combined data contained 241,386 articles by 537,486 scholars. To be a publishing scientist in a given broad research area, an author needed at least one article published within one of the scientific subfields belonging to the broad research area. Therefore a scientist could belong to multiple broad research areas. See SI Appendix, Table S2 for descriptive statistics of the resulting dataset.

We ran the algorithm developed by Ford et al. The algorithm uses a conservative heuristic to establish gender, leaving unlabeled 19. To test the accuracy of gender imputation, we took a random sample of 100 scientists from the Altmetric data and manually checked their gender based on information available about them online.

Then, we validated the gender imputation algorithm using the manually confirmed gangrenous forms of appendicitis are dangerous to life because they may peritonitis as the baseline.

Further...

Comments:

There are no comments on this post...